Hey people. Today is kind of a philosophical Weird Wed. I met a guy the other day who was trying to explain his lifestyle. I have to admit, at the time he caught me I had a bunch of other stuff on my mind, so was kind of distracted and my brain was kind of fried. To top it off, his explanation involved lots of legalese. When someone says, "In 1971, the supreme court ruled
bla bla bla" it's about as meaningful to me as a complex math equation.

You know what happens next right? In my brain? That's right-- this:

Anyway, what I got out of it all was that this guy does not file or pay taxes of any kind, doesn't have tabs on his truck, doesn't make house payments or credit card payments-- he's basically opted-out of the entire financial system. He claims this is all legal, because of various constitutional stuff and legal decisions etc he was quoting. He thinks the government is too big. He thinks big corporations should pay for stuff like social services. He gets his mail general delivery. He says 35 million people are living this way in the U.S.
I have no idea if this is true, or why this guy isn't in a cell or homeless. I did a quick
internet search and found some wiki stuff about tax resisters/tax protesters, but still don't feel like I know anything about this. There is a chance everything this guy was saying is true. Maybe we've all been had.
I guess the interesting question to me is, say this was a viable option-- opting out-- would you take it?
Hold that thought.
I've also been having a few other interesting
convos lately. Someone else I know is very upset about "capitalism." When I questioned them further about this their main beef seemed to involve the way Americans in particular have fallen into a pattern of retail therapy. He said marketing/advertising is designed to chip away at our self-esteem and make us feel unless we are able to acquire this or that thing, or brand, we're "less than", etc etc. I think this person feels large corporations are controlling everything in some malevolent way. He's trying to figure out a way to opt out.
I think many of us have felt that large corporations abuse power when they can get away with it, but they also fund major research etc. I don't like to see that unhealthy type of consumerism that bothers this guy either, and Americans can be, let's face it, kind gross in this way.
But is the free market fundamentally broken or do we just need to be more cognisant of our purchasing choices?
Hold that thought.
I also had a
convo recently with someone I know who is really religious. I'm not. I'm not "anti" per-
se. If someone feels they get something positive from church or whatever, good for them. It's just not my thing, and I do resent people who are pious and self-righteous. This person has a hard time understanding my thinking. If I'm not religious they tend to think I have no beliefs at all, which isn't true.
I don't believe in hell. This other person does. Their position was, of course, "it says in the bible" etc etc, but I kept after them trying to get them to think beyond their programming and they eventually said hell was something that kept people in line. That it was a consequence of not obeying the way "God" wants people to act/be.
My response was, "So, are you saying the only thing preventing you from going on a giant killing spree, or stealing everything not nailed down, or being generally a big ass-- is fear of going to hell?"
Them- "Um, ... no?"
So if there were "no rules", would there be complete mayhem or would human nature dictate some basic agreed upon, if unspoken, standards of behavior? Would group think level out at about the same point anyway?
It is so interesting to me the way people think differently about things. Right now with globalization and the
internet, it feels like it could be a time of a real shift in the way people think. Long held conventions could begin to crumble. This is scary to some, exciting to others.
I like to still believe in the fabled "great society," -- where everyone contributes, and there are wonderful public works projects like parks, and an infrastructure that functions seamlessly, and the sick and old are cared for. For some reason when I think of this it's always set in either the turn of the century (not this last one, the other sepia-toned one, with the ice skating and bustles and giant redwoods), or in the distant future (you know, the one with- silver spandex jumpsuits and monorails, and jet packs, and, of course, flying cars).
I guess I would not opt out, but I also don't feel everything works perfectly.
What do you guys think about all this?